Espen Lagarde vs Pablo Trochu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lagarde vs Trochu analysis and find out who is favored!
Espen Lagarde vs Pablo Trochu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lagarde 0 - 0 Trochu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lagarde has won 37.5% of points on his second serve, while Trochu has won 45.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lagarde, in recent form, has won 40.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Trochu has won 52.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.15% and 36.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lagarde has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Trochu has saved 57.87% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lagarde has won 52.63% of matches played (W/L 10/ 9), with Trochu winning 58.33% (W/L 42/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lagarde has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9). Trochu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 61), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Lagarde has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 10/ 9), where as Trochu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 42/ 30). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lagarde has played against opponents with an average rank of 35.16 while Trochu has played against players with an average rank of 89.01.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lagarde has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Trochu has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lagarde has converted 38.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Trochu has converted 46.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lagarde 0 - 0 Trochu
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
48% (10-11)
Career Total W/L
59% (97-68)
50% (6-6)
YTD W/L
59% (19-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Espen Lagarde | Pablo Trochu |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (6/6) | 59% (19/13) |
Sets Win/Loss | 48% (13/14) | 56% (42/33) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (123/125) | 54% (370/320) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 61% (19/12) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.09 |
Aces Total | 7 | 31 |
DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 19 | 67 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:12:7 |
Avg Opp Rank | 55.67 | 104.19 |
1st Serve % | 62% (119/191) | 65% (1016/1555) |
1st Serve W% | 66% (78/119) | 62% (626/1016) |
2nd Serve W% | 38% (27/72) | 46% (246/539) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (8/21) | 47% (73/156) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (66/164) | 42% (606/1431) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (6/6) | 59% (19/13) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (6/12) | 58% (18/31) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 60% (6/10) |
1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 88% (17/15) |
1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 12% (17/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 27% (15/4) |
Espen Lagarde Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Espen Lagarde
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Espen Lagarde
Player
Ahmed Mouhan
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
93%
(
52 of
56)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Marcel Politowicz
Player
Espen Lagarde
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 2-6 10-3 | H2H |
view more
Pablo Trochu Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Pablo Trochu
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Pablo Trochu
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pablo Trochu
Player
Rohan Mehra
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Giles Hussey
Player
Pablo Trochu
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pablo Trochu
Player
Joshua Sheehy
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Pablo Trochu
Player
Qiulin Wang
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more